It is a bit cumbersome to look at, but it is mainly for reference anyway. For each score, I have placed four pieces of information.

Upper left corner is Traditional Match Equity, like you would find in any other match equity table.

Upper right corner is the Gammon Value on a 2 cube, or once the cube is turned. I further color coded the GV according to MCG's terminology.

Red = Dead cube or gammon value of 0

Light Red = Crippled cube or low gammon value less than money

Yellow = Moneyish or gammon value near .5

Light Green = Elevated gammon value or gammon value larger than money

Green = Gammon Go or gammon value near 1

Bottom left corner is Takepoint on initial cube. Value is raw or gammonless.

Bottom right corner is Takepoint on recube. Again value is raw or gammonless.

I'm not sure how this will look on a blog post. My orginal work was done in Excel, and is in nice proportion. I sized it to print very small, so small I taped it to a credit card which I carry in my wallet. Alternatively you could size it to fit on an index card or a whole sheet of paper, whatever.

Finally, imagine a line cutting through the chart flowing from top left to bottom right. Scores are listed twice from both the Leader and Trailer perspectives. The Top half is from the Leader point of view and Bottom half from the Trailer point of view.

For the Crawford scores, only the match equity is shown.

7 Pt Match | L E A D E R | |||||||||||||

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||

TRAILER | 1 | 50 | 68 | 75 | 81 | 84 | 89 | 91 | ||||||

2 | 32 | 50 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 74 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 84 | 0 | |

32 | - | 26 | 32 | 20 | 50 | 17 | 41 | 23 | 33 | 22 | 36 | |||

3 | 25 | 40 | .48 | 50 | .5 | 57 | .45 | 65 | .46 | 71 | .36 | 76 | .37 | |

25 | - | 29 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 18 | 33 | 21 | 28 | 22 | 30 | |||

4 | 19 | 33 | 1.0 | 43 | .97 | 50 | .98 | 58 | .82 | 64 | .67 | 70 | .60 | |

19 | - | 21 | 19 | 19 | 33 | 17 | 30 | 21 | 25 | 21 | 26 | |||

5 | 16 | 26 | .69 | 35 | .74 | 42 | .77 | 50 | .66 | 57 | .61 | 63 | .55 | |

23 | - | 19 | 16 | 21 | 26 | 18 | 24 | 21 | 23 | 21 | 24 | |||

6 | 11 | 20 | .51 | 29 | .54 | 36 | .56 | 43 | .57 | 50 | .55 | 56 | .54 | |

22 | - | 20 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 22 | 16 | 21 | 21 | 20 | 22 | |||

7 | 9 | 16 | .56 | 24 | .57 | 30 | .56 | 37 | .56 | 44 | .54 | 50 | .54 | |

23 | - | 18 | 9 | 21 | 26 | 21 | 24 | 21 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |||

GV >> | DEAD | CRIPPLED | MONEY | ELEVATED | GG |

**Remembering the Match Equity values.**

Crawford equities I remember going down.

32,

**25**, 19,

**16**, 11,

**9.**The odd away equities are the anchors in my mind.

3 away Crawford is 25, and 5 away is about 15 and 7 away is about 10.

Not exact, but I seem to remember the odd away and the nice round numbers 25,15,10 (even though these are off a bit I usually can get to 16 and 9 from there)

I remember the Two-away equities this way.

2 away 3 away is 40%, or 2 / (2+3).

2 away 4 away is about one third, or 33%, or 2 / (2+4).

**2**away

**5**away is about

**25,**

As MCG showed in his Gammon Village article, two-away equities are close to Crawford (shift two).

For the out 2-away scores, I approximate using MCG's method.

For example, 2 away 6 away is similar to 1 away 4 away Crawford or about 19 (actually 20).

And 2 away 7 away is similar to 1 away 5 away Crawford or about 15 (actually 16).

3 away equities are already covered by Crawford and 2 away notes above.

The only remaining 4 away equity is 3 away 4 away.

at

**3**away

**4**away one player has

**43**% (nice trick from Turz on BGO)

For 5 away equities..

at

**3**away

**5**away one player has

**35**% (also from Turz).

4 away 5 away is either halfway btwn 35 and 50 or 42.5%, or use Neils Number of 8 to get ~42.

For 6 away equities ... use Neils Number of 7.

For 7 away equties .. use Stick's trick.

Start with 7 away Crawford at 9%, then add 7% in steps up for the other scores.

Or start with 44% for 6 away 7 away and subtract 7% in steps down for other scores.

I remember that Neils Numbers as applied to the old Woolsey table use the key number 13 for the near-in values. For 7 away through 3 away you take 13 minus the points away to get to Neils Number.

For example, 3 away is 13-3 or Neils Number of 10. 4 away is 13-4 or Neils Number 9, etc through 7 away.

**Remembering the Gammon Values**

Cube is dead for Leader at 2 away scores (obvious)

Cube is crippled for Leader at 3 away 6 away and 3 away 7 away. Think Stick's rule (the rule is never double as Leader at 3 away 6 away or more but it should also prompt you to remember that gammon value is crippled for the leader).

Gammon value is moneyish for the Leader at other 3 away scores. (including 3 away 3away which is exactly .50)

Gammon value is also moneyish for the Trailer at 2 away 3 away.

Gammon Value is 1.0 at 4 away 2 away for the trailer and almost 1.0 at 4 away 3 away for the trailer and for both sides at 4 away 4 away.

Gammon values are elavated for both sides at 4 away 5 away but actually higher for the leader.

Gammon values are elevated for the leader at other 4 away scores ( 4 away 6 away and 4 away 7 away)

*since the leader needs exactly four points*to win the match.

At 6 away and 7 away scores, Gammon Values are moneyish for the trailer, regardless of exact score. (slightly higher than money but not too much to worry about)

**Remembering the Initial Takepoints**

Takepoints on initial cubes are moneyish at most scores.

TP 32% or about 1/3 at 2 away 2 away.

TP 26.5% for the leader at 2 away 3 away, which is high.

TP 25% for trailer at 3 away 2 away, which is also high.

TP is 30% at 3 away 3 away, which is VERY HIGH. The highest in the whole chart.

TP is about 19% for both sides at 2 away 4 away but beware this is gammonless!! Leader should use use NeilKaz Rule of 80 to evaluate cubes. Take if estimate Trailer Wins + Trailer Gammon Wins < 80%, otherwise DROP!!

TP is low for the leader at 5 away scores (17-18%). Keep in mind again these are gammonless takepoints!!

2 away 5 away. I think the reason is you are getting a free shot at winning the match.

3 away 5 away. I think the reason is favorable risk/reward.... the trailer has tremendous cube leverage if you drop anyway (and go to 3a 4a) plus you get a free chance at advancing to Crawford so you might as well go for it.. again this assumes gammons are low.

4 away 5 away. Not sure on this one. Guessing losing a plain game not too bad since then you are behind but will have tremendous cube leverage next game as the trailer (where your GV is almost 1.0 at 4a 3a). Also your gammon value is as leader at (4a 5a) is actually higher than the trailer and you might just win the match this game.

Initial takepoint is moneyish for all 6 away and 7 away scores (assuming low gammon games once gain).

Takepoint for Trailer is also moneyish for all 2 away scores. Leader should only double a race or holding game but he doubles as per money and Trailer takes/drops as per money. The rewhips for the trailer at 2a 5a and further back are just not that powerful.

**Remembering the Recube Takepoints**

Actually I don't have a way to remember these right now. And this is a weakness for me at this time.

Generally speaking, the leader is hesitant to redouble to 4 as he may be putting the match on the line while simultaneously killing his own gammons.

On the other hand, the Trailer is eager to redouble to 4 - the value of the recube often justifies taking deep positions that you would otherwise pass for money.

If the recube puts the match on the line, then the takepoint is simply the match equity if you drop. For example, the takepoint on a redouble at 4 away 4 away is 32% (the ME at 4a 2a).

For other scores, I attempt to do the takepoint calculation in my head - which I really struggle at!!

TP = EP - TL / (TL - TW)

EP equity if pass

TL equity if take&lose

TW equity if take&win